Eastern Art Online, Yousef Jameel Centre for Islamic and Asian Art

Ashmolean − Eastern Art Online, Yousef Jameel Centre for Islamic and Asian Art

Indian Art in the Ashmolean Museum

A catalogue of the Ashmolean’s collection of Indian art by J. C. Harle and Andrew Topsfield (published Oxford, 1987).

Indian Art in the Ashmolean Museum by J. C. Harle and Andrew Topsfield

Publications online: 143 objects

Reference URL

Actions

Send e-mail

Contact us about this object

Send e-mail

Send to a friend

Relief plaque depicting the goddess Hariti

  • Literature notes

    The folk origins of this goddess, associated with smallpox and hence “the stealer” (of children) are clear. Her cult must have been widespread amongst Buddhists, for she was frequently represented in the Kusāna period (first centuries A.D.) in both Gandhara, the present northernmost portions of Pakistan and parts of Afghanistan, as well as Mathura. In both places she is usually shown seated, festooned with children and usually wearing a version of local dress. In Gandhara she is often accompanied by Kubera, also originally a folk deity [EA1962.42].

    This figure of Hārītī, is in the squatting position adopted by many figures during the Kusāna and Gupta periods at Mathura, from female goddesses to images of Sūrrya, the Sun god [see EA1971.13]. She holds a large cup or bowl, tightly clasped by all five fingers, in her right hand; her left clasps a child. A small much worn figure at her feet appears to be an elephant-headed god, Ganesa [see EAX.182 and EAX.245]. If so, it is perhaps his earliest appearance, although his presence in this context is difficult to explain. The nature of the cross-barred frame into which the goddess has thrust her feet, although it occurs elsewhere, and with male figures as well, has not been explained. For the squatting pose, [see EA1972.45].

    The “pompom” hair style [see EAOS. 34] is characteristic of Mathura during the Kuṣāṇa period. So is the architectural surround: the pillars with double capitals and the pediment in the shape of an ogee arch (gavākṣa). This last was to become one of the most ubiquitous of all Indian architectural motifs, reproduced a myriad times on Hindu and Jaina temples in subsequent centuries. The human figures in relief on the pillars, and even the figured with garlands in the beautiful Indian “flying” pose at the top corners [see also EA1985.5 and EAOS. 62] all appear, appropriately to be children. Relief stele such as this with an image of a god or goddess in the centre will now become the most common form of Indian sculpture.
  • Description

    Hariti was invoked as a protectress of children, particularly from smallpox. She is shown with a child on her knee.

  • Details

    Associated place
    AsiaIndianorth IndiaUttar PradeshMathura district Mathura (place of creation)
    Date
    2nd century AD (AD 101 - 200)
    Kushan Period (AD 50 - 600)
    Material and technique
    mottled red sandstone
    Dimensions
    43 x 28.9 x 12 cm (height x width x depth)
    Material index
    Technique index
    Object type index
    No. of items
    1
    Credit line
    Purchased with the assistance of the Friends of the Ashmolean Museum, 1971.
    Accession no.
    EA1971.36
  • Further reading

    Harle, J. C., and Andrew Topsfield, Indian Art in the Ashmolean Museum (Oxford: Ashmolean Museum, 1987), no. 13 on pp. 11-12, pp. 15, 20, & 46, illus. p. 11

    Ahuja, Naman, ‘Early Indian Art at the Ashmolean Museum - Catalogue in progress’, 2016, no. 96

Location

    • Ground floor | Room 12 | India to 600

Objects are sometimes moved to a different location. Our object location data is usually updated on a monthly basis. Contact the Jameel Study Centre if you are planning to visit the museum to see a particular object on display, or would like to arrange an appointment to see an object in our reserve collections.

 

Publications online

  • Indian Art in the Ashmolean Museum by J. C. Harle and Andrew Topsfield

    Indian Art in the Ashmolean Museum

    The folk origins of this goddess, associated with smallpox and hence “the stealer” (of children) are clear. Her cult must have been widespread amongst Buddhists, for she was frequently represented in the Kusāna period (first centuries A.D.) in both Gandhara, the present northernmost portions of Pakistan and parts of Afghanistan, as well as Mathura. In both places she is usually shown seated, festooned with children and usually wearing a version of local dress. In Gandhara she is often accompanied by Kubera, also originally a folk deity [EA1962.42].

    This figure of Hārītī, is in the squatting position adopted by many figures during the Kusāna and Gupta periods at Mathura, from female goddesses to images of Sūrrya, the Sun god [see EA1971.13]. She holds a large cup or bowl, tightly clasped by all five fingers, in her right hand; her left clasps a child. A small much worn figure at her feet appears to be an elephant-headed god, Ganesa [see EAX.182 and EAX.245]. If so, it is perhaps his earliest appearance, although his presence in this context is difficult to explain. The nature of the cross-barred frame into which the goddess has thrust her feet, although it occurs elsewhere, and with male figures as well, has not been explained. For the squatting pose, [see EA1972.45].

    The “pompom” hair style [see EAOS. 34] is characteristic of Mathura during the Kuṣāṇa period. So is the architectural surround: the pillars with double capitals and the pediment in the shape of an ogee arch (gavākṣa). This last was to become one of the most ubiquitous of all Indian architectural motifs, reproduced a myriad times on Hindu and Jaina temples in subsequent centuries. The human figures in relief on the pillars, and even the figured with garlands in the beautiful Indian “flying” pose at the top corners [see also EA1985.5 and EAOS. 62] all appear, appropriately to be children. Relief stele such as this with an image of a god or goddess in the centre will now become the most common form of Indian sculpture.
Notice

Object information may not accurately reflect the actual contents of the original publication, since our online objects contain current information held in our collections database. Click on 'buy this publication' to purchase printed versions of our online publications, where available, or contact the Jameel Study Centre to arrange access to books on our collections that are now out of print.

© 2013 University of Oxford - Ashmolean Museum